Combating Luxury Electricity Supplier Fake Goods Still Need To Be Overweight

< p > here, the world's < a target= "_blank" href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/" > clothing < /a > a target= "_blank" href= "_blank".

< /p >

P is a demand for goods and a faking product. It is the status quo of luxury shopping in China's electricity supplier. Of course, this is only part of the status quo, not all.

It is definitely not just a buyer's seller's problem that luxury goods suppliers are repeatedly banned.

< /p >

Less than 30 years ago, most consumers in China did not know what luxury goods were, and China is now the world's largest luxury market. P

< /p >

< p > < strong > Why are luxury goods sellers banned repeatedly? < /strong > < /p >

< p > strong a href= "//www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_s.asp" > consumption < /a > is one of the important reasons.

It is reported that China's luxury consumer market accounts for 29% of the world's total, and its overall size exceeds 100 billion dollars.

10% of them were purchased directly in China, and up to 19% were purchased through overseas travel or online shopping.

< /p >

< p > Chinese consumers are already the most powerful consumers in the global tourism industry, and many luxury stores also specializes in shopping guides who understand Chinese.

The lack of luxury stores in deep inland areas makes it easy for consumers to move to Internet access and hope to buy low-priced luxury goods.

< /p >

P is a demand for goods and a faking product. It is the status quo of luxury shopping in China's electricity supplier. Of course, this is only part of the status quo, not all.

It is definitely not just a buyer's seller's problem that luxury goods suppliers are repeatedly banned.

< /p >

< p > platform business omission < /p >

< p > the jumei.com announcement of the event said: "the company has produced a complete business license, a relevant commodity authorization letter, an import declaration form for related goods, and information on cooperation with a number of e-commerce providers.

We will never shirk our responsibilities.

For the mistakes in the qualification examination of the third party platform and the loopholes in the business process of the cooperative business, we will be deeply responsible for the consumer's attitude, and be deeply introspective, accountability, and serious rectification and handling.

< /p >

< p > if the brand is authorized, the platform side will make more phone calls to confirm it.

There is no fake commodity, for core business, random sampling, to brand inspection, it is not so difficult.

In the case of potential counterfeit goods, the platform business chose to turn a blind eye.

< /p >

< p > < strong > brand does not supply directly, < /strong > /p >

< p > third sellers sell fake goods. Why do they not introduce real sellers or simply run their own businesses? In fact, platform vendors have been working hard to directly introduce luxury brands to live directly, such as Burberry's cooperation with Tmall a few months ago.

And more luxury brands refuse to cooperate. Of course, there are various reasons.

One of them is that luxury brands have cooperation with domestic agents. If direct online sales are actually infringing on the interests of agents, the sales of offline brands will occupy a large proportion.

This is not just a luxury issue. When some offline brands are doing online business, they are forced to withdraw new products and even close stores because of complaints from offline agents.

< /p >

< p > there are mainly three channels of luxury supply for e-commerce platform luxury.

One is the direct cooperation of suppliers, one is the sea Amoy, some people buy overseas express into the territory, and the other is offline agents.

Of course, there are a lot of fake sellers on the line are counterfeiting themselves as luxury goods agents, offline stores turn online sales, and there are a group of people who claim to be factory end orders.

Of course, the safest is the first, and the latter two kinds of customs declarations, invoices and so on can be faked.

< /p >

< p > strong > strike still needs to be further increased < /strong > < /p >.

< p > in Singapore, the law stipulates that shops sell fake products. Once discovered, they will be flogging in addition to heavy fines, and shopkeepers will become penniless.

France has passed the Runge act in 1994 to protect intellectual property rights.

At the time of customs inspection, the staff of the brand manufacturers usually assist the customs officers in carrying out the work together. These people are called "brand inspectors". Whoever buys or uses fake brand-name products in France will face heavy penalties. 5 or less of them will be confiscated; 5 to 10 pieces will be fined; 10 or more will be considered as counterfeiting products, which will be sent to the court for trial, and the maximum penalty for sanctions is 300 thousand euros and is sentenced to 3 years' imprisonment.

< /p >

< p >, therefore, in the countries that attach importance to the protection of intellectual property rights, one is businessmen who dare not sell "a href=" //www.sjfzxm.com/news/index_f.asp "fake" /a ", one is that consumers dare not buy fake goods.

It seems that the punishment for protecting intellectual property rights in China needs to be further strengthened! < /p >